« Has the McCain campaign turned into a traveling KKK rally?Angry white Republicans vent their frustrations at McCain rally. »

Texas U.S. Senate Debate: Yvonne Schick shines above Noriega and Cornyn.

10/09/08 | by txwordpounder [mail] | Categories: News, Elections

I am really pumped up about Libertarian Party candidate Yvonne Schick after her stellar performance in Thurday night's Texas U.S. Senate debate that was televised across the state on PBS stations. Bravo! Yvonne. You are a gutsy gal who isn't afraid to say what needs to be said. A true stateswoman who put principle and common sense above the pandering politics of the Republicrats.

Democratic candidate Rick Noriega and Republican incumbent John Cornyn danced around two important issues that have largely been overshadowed in the presidential race by the collapsing economy--the War on Drugs and the PATRIOT Act. Minor differences aside, both candidates largely agreed that these police-state actions should continue into the future. Schick, on the other hand, looked straight at the camera and without flinching or blinking said emphatically that she did not support the Patriot Act and that the War on Drugs should come to an end. Both are more destruction to individual liberty and the social fabric than they are constructive. We need common sense, not police-state thuggery.

I do have some issues with the Libertarian Party platform's advocacy of free-market capitalism. Sometimes you can't win on everything. At this point in the capitalist meltdown cycle, I don't believe the Libertarians could make things any worse economically than they already are. After all, Cornyn voted to bailout billionaires and Noriega nodded his approval. So I'm willing to forego that issue for the time being because I believe the War on Drugs and the Patriot Act are core fundamental issues that cut to the heart of our democracy (or what passes as such), and regardless of what kind of economic system arises from the current wreckage, protection of individual liberty from police-state incursions should always be paramount. If we don't have freedom, then the rest of it is meaningless.

Look out! Noriega and Cornyn. Yvonne Schick is on your tails and is poised to take a big chunk out of your butts. Texas progressive bloggers can write her off as a wacko if they want to, but if Democrats think Schick will just take votes away from Cornyn, they better think again. Noriega is everything I hate in the Texas Democratic Party and the Democratic Party in general. Nothing but fence-sitting, carrion-eating, police-state-supporting MOR panderers who are just as flakey and pathetic as the Republicans. Go get 'em girl! You got my vote!

UPDATE: I've done some internet searching on the rumor being blogged around by both the left and the right that Schick is a Scientologist. So far, I've found nothing credible to support this. Only unsubstantiated and unsourced commentary, mainly by people on the left and right who have a vested interest in seeing her opponents win the Texas U.S. Senate race. If anybody has verifiable information about this (besides the unsubstantiated info on TruthInScientology that the bloggers are linking to--don't you people read disclaimers before passing this stuff around?), then by all means post it in the comments.

Yvonne Schick. Texas Libertarian candidate for U.S. Senate.

5 comments

Comment from: David Carter [Visitor] Email
I watched the debate. I sent money to Yvonne.
Seeing how she is being excluded from the next
"debate". As for the "religion" question, She neither confirmed nor denied the statement from the question, she responded as a Libertarian and only as a Libertarian. I would like to see her in the next debate. She needs to expand on her first responses and emphasis that the other two parties certainly have made a mess of things.
10/10/08 @ 07:46
Comment from: KeeKee [Visitor]
Yvonne Schick is indeed a scientologist.

http://www.culthelp.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5060

Please google ExScientologyKids.com
10/10/08 @ 08:52
Comment from: txwordpounder [Member] Email
David I agree that Schick should be allowed in the last debate. I know the Republicrats tried like hell to keep out of all the debates. I don't care about a person's religion just so long as they don't bring it into the political arena. Sarah Palin chose to cross that line. I don't think Schick stands a chance of winning, but I like the way she stood out from Noriega and Cornyn.

KeeKee, that comment you provided the link to has been cut-and-pasted on at least a half-dozen blogs and several sci-hater websites. I find it questionable at best. It doesn't prove anything.

The author only uses his first name, Simon, and doesn't provide any verifiable evidence. He misspells Yvonne twice (Yvone)and begins one salutation with "Dear Sir/Maddam." Two of the links provided in the post lead to a blank page and the other link is to the TruthIn Scientology info that I mentioned in my post as being unsubstantiated and unverified info that could belong to anybody. And on that flimsy bit of nothing you make the grand pronouncement that "Yvonne Schick is indeed a scientologist."

In my googling travels around the web, I found at least two Yvonne Schicks besides the Texas U.S. Senate candidate. One in Florida and the other in New York. Maybe Scientologists can clone themselves--I don't know. Just because you find info that contains the same name as someone you're googling doesn't necessarily mean it pertains to them. I haven't found anything that substantively links the Texas Schick to the TIS info. I got to have more than just Simon Says before I accept it as fact. Others should too.

What was I supposed to find at ExScientologyKids? I didn't see anything about Yvonne Schick, and the site doesn't have a search feature.

I don't know any Scientologists and never have had a desire to learn anything about it. I've seen it described as a totalitarian religion (personally I consider all religions totalitarian) and so I'm scratching my head trying to figure out why a Scientologist would join the Libertarian Party. It doesn't add up if, in fact, Scientology is as tyrannical as the sci-haters say it is.
I do know that it's the Baptists, not the Scientologists, who are trying to keep me from being able to buy beer at the local convenience store and who are constantly trying to shove their religious dogma in my face. When Scientologists start doing that, then I'll start worrying about them.
10/11/08 @ 01:43
Comment from: Joey Dauben [Visitor] · http://www.elliscountyobserver.com
Editor,

Believe it or not, I was siding with you. I didn't mean for it to come off as me going after you, just more or less the digs from the religious right ...sorry if you took it any other way.

Good to know you're also on board.
10/15/08 @ 11:35
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2061792117043839932&hl=en

Watch the debate at 32:20 they ask her a question referring to her being a Scientologist and the decisions she would make about mental health...she gets around it by saying... "As a Libertarian I would..."

She makes a good point that the government should have no part in mental health but does not deny being a Scientologist.
10/21/08 @ 10:43

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
September 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Search

XML Feeds

Homeland Security. Fighting terrorism since 1492.

Save the Internet: Click here

Bloggers' Rights at EFF